[Conkeror] Any way to get greasemonkey to work?

[Trent W. Buck]

Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jeremy at jeremyms.com> writes:

> [...] for any given functionality implemented by a greasemonkey
> script, there is almost certainly a much cleaner and nicer way to
> implement it directly as a Conkeror module.

While I don't dispute that, somebody has to then go to the work of
writing and maintaining that module -- and there are (presumably)
Conkeror users out there who can't (or don't want to) do that much yak
shaving.