[Enigmail] Any chance of X-PGP-Sig support?

[Robert J. Hansen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Andrzej Filip wrote:
> Are there any chances for enigmail support of X-PGP-Sig standard?

	1.  It's not a standard.
	2.  It hasn't been adopted by any standards body.
	3.  The specification is not ready for prime time.

For these reason, the answer is "not yet, and probably not in the near
future, either."  Of course, I'm just the UI geek; if Patrick decides
this would be a nifty feature, he'll implement it.  But knowing how many
things he already has on his plate, I suspect he'll concur.

> IMHO it is the best format (I know) for signing Usenet posts.

As opposed to inline RFC4880, which is (a) well-specified, (b) has
multiple implementations, and (c) is supported by many different Usenet
mail readers?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iFYEAREIAAYFAkdlvf8ACgkQf2XByo0Cu7OkxgDdEiRzh80tCV3RU6MHyyt5809T
c3XG3NNR1RtS2wDfbpSp1/4BpKrnueLIZ1765cVKRBFma60sntJ194kBHAQBAQgA
BgUCR2W9/wAKCRC3APSC/q+BCTCIB/9qRLYxsE5FpvxesKbure7BTxNX+bWLWpAM
fXJkilB1kpw2CXaAaA5V+Kvi8WpSMuSnEkQvpZ/RorQ8SgEcN5EVvu0YRiW1GHvA
T9GX4tyhKatyKZPBBZbDE/z6qTWYG2PkEa7oIGivVKvRkHh68Qdj6UG+u1tCXEkY
8JngwoemIUYQIAWCu6W5si3l/o+IqfAnRxYAbRAHG/dgkkMEcoFVBu029NZz/vJp
Mv1MyZEFvHoDYrEYggEtS8GKQ5x3rq/MSa+qowooH2AB4EpaoFhSlVwPryzm15Y7
iNGAHfSm50by5jSUXqAPCa25mdJrYnG6pxSHGYULKi0nQLKvn0mH
=D3eO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----