[Enigmail] Any chance of X-PGP-Sig support?

[Andrzej Filip]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Andrzej Filip wrote:
>> Are there any chances for enigmail support of X-PGP-Sig standard?
> 
> 	1.  It's not a standard.
> 	2.  It hasn't been adopted by any standards body.
> 	3.  The specification is not ready for prime time.
> 
> For these reason, the answer is "not yet, and probably not in the near
> future, either."  Of course, I'm just the UI geek; if Patrick decides
> this would be a nifty feature, he'll implement it.  But knowing how many
> things he already has on his plate, I suspect he'll concur.

There are *de facto* standards. AFAIK X-PGP-Sig has been used to sign
Usenet control messages [create/delete group].

>> IMHO it is the best format (I know) for signing Usenet posts.
> 
> As opposed to inline RFC4880, which is (a) well-specified, (b) has
> multiple implementations, and (c) is supported by many different Usenet
> mail readers?

About exactly which part of rfc4880 you talk about?
  http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4880.txt

Which part of it describes how to sign email/news messages in a way:
1) "fully invisible" to almost all news/email readers not supporting it
2) capable to sign subset of "main RFC822/RFC2822 headers"

URL(s):
ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/pgpcontrol/