[Greasemonkey] Goals for the user script directory (very long)

Jeremy Dunck jdunck at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 14:19:32 EDT 2005

On Apr 8, 2005 11:44 AM, Aaron Boodman <zboogs at gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess. it's just that full text search has sorta been done :) Wish
> there was a way to use existing providers. If only f***ing google
> would expose .user.js. :: sigh :: Delicious doesn't provide text
> searching?

Oh.  I wouldn't write one from scratch.  Maybe lucene or something.

> > interested in hearing arguments against keeping all versions
> I really don't want people to think of user scripts as versioned
> robust objects. Since they are inherently not. I think that doing what
> you propse would encourage that. I guess it's a UI issue.

I agree that the scripts are fragile, and I'm interested in versions
more for trust and grimoire than for the perception of stability or
completeness.  I do think I could make the versioning not-too-obvious.

More information about the Greasemonkey mailing list