mihai.parparita at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 11:04:40 EDT 2005
You may want to consider base64 encoding your data URLs (as opposed to
ASCII encoding). The generated URL will be ~40% smaller.
On 4/13/05, Amit Upadhyay <upadhyay at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/12/05, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 12, 2005 8:44 AM, Amit Upadhyay <upadhyay at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > Well, if this script gets popular, your provider is going to get slammed:
> > var provider = "http://www.rootshell.be/~aurum/smileys/";
> Thanks for the advice, I have updated my script, now it uses dataurls! I
> have also removed l) as a smiley as they were mostly not intended in most of
> the cases I came across them. Also the placement of images with respect to
> surrounding text be better now. I have also tried using the click event
> handler thing in Aaron's http://youngpup.net/userscripts/gmailto.user.js,
> but it is not playing nice with gmail's rich text composer, so disabled it,
> is it a known issue?
> Anyways, please update.
> Amit Upadhyay
> Blog: http://www.rootshell.be/~upadhyay
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
More information about the Greasemonkey