[Greasemonkey] say horray for evalInSandbox()
arantius at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 11:57:49 EDT 2005
On 7/18/05, Aaron Boodman <zboogs at gmail.com> wrote:
> * it's pretty slow! ~20-40ms for each insertion
> * having trouble getting decent error reports when user scripts fail
While I strongly applaud your efforts in the suddenly-come-to-light
security issues, I hope this isn't the final solution =) I absolutely
love greasemonkey, I have written quite a range of scripts for it, and
I currently have 11 include * scripts, and a few site specifics. It
simply won't work to have a half second delay added on every page.
As an aside, if I read the other long thread correctly there's only
two actual issues to consider:
- Leaking API calls (and through them local files)
- Leaking script source
I don't care much about the latter, and the first only for the files.
I only use 1 script that makes any API calls (and just menu commands)
that I can live without rather easily. So I'm safe with the neutered
0.3.5 posted correct?
More information about the Greasemonkey