[Greasemonkey] Greasemonkey Dict

Aaron Kurtz aaron.kurtz at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 11:37:54 EDT 2005


Would using an extension that specifically blocks all JS save a specified 
whitelist allow us to run the older versions safely? Assuming that we only 
allow trusted sites to run JS?

Aa

On 7/21/05, Jeremy Dunck <jdunck at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 7/21/05, Josh Matthews <mrlachatte at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm on the 0.4 alpha, I'm pretty sure that most stuff was re-enabled for 
> that.
> >
> 
> 0.3.5 and 0.4.1 (released in mail subject "whole other monkey") are
> the only safe versions.
> 0.4 releases prior to that have the exploit.
> _______________________________________________
> Greasemonkey mailing list
> Greasemonkey at mozdev.org
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/greasemonkey
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mozdev.org/pipermail/greasemonkey/attachments/20050721/39617c34/attachment.htm


More information about the Greasemonkey mailing list