[Greasemonkey] APIs

Jeremy Dunck jdunck at gmail.com
Mon Sep 5 09:48:01 EDT 2005


On 9/4/05, Lenny Domnitser <ldrhcp at gmail.com> wrote:
> A better solution, in my opinion, would be to write a new script value
> storage system (a rewrite has already been discussed) that could
> transparently write to and read from local disk or a remote location
> based on the user's preference, from the standard GM_[gs]etValue
> functions.

You couldn't use local and network values interchangably due to the
difference in latency; caching wouldn't work since you have no way of
knowing whether the (network) store changed.


More information about the Greasemonkey mailing list