[Greasemonkey] Philosophy of configuration designs
gm at plsek.id.au
Tue Sep 13 16:30:59 EDT 2005
Randy J. Ray wrote:
> I want to re-visit the discussion over ways of letting users configure
> GM scripts that require various config data. I read up on the
> archives, so I'm not looking to re-hash the arguments from that
> thread. Rather, I want to get some feedback about what I see as two
> ways of configuration:
That's the second time my reply got totally WASHED CLEAN ... seems I
have to send the response in Plain text, no Auto Detect!!!
Anyway .... what I DID say was:
Personally, I prefer self contained scripts, websites do "go down", and
you KNOW it'll happen at the worst possible moment!!
However, I do agree, the configuration code can more than double the
size of a script and can become cumbersome to maintain when adding
features to a script.
More information about the Greasemonkey