[Slogger] Sigh
Ken Schutte
kschutte at MIT.EDU
Tue Nov 29 00:18:52 EST 2005
Jon B wrote:
> 1. I really like the idea behind Slogger (I save *everything*), and
> have found it useful a few times in remembering things that I wouldn't
> have been able to remember otherwise, but it is slowing down my
> computer A LOT. Every time I load a page, it freezes for several
> seconds. I think it gets worse with time (maybe getting better at the
> beginning of each month? We'll see...) Is there anything that could
> be done to improve this? I wonder if it is the log file or the data
> files that is slowing it down.
Is it set including all downloaded pages in the Firefox download
manager? (Look at Ctl-Y). If not, I'm not sure what's happening...
> 2. It saves a lot of redundant data. I wish there were a way to
> compress the files that it saves. I might try using NTFS's file
> compression, but I fear that would just make it even slower.
I'm not sure of an elegant way to deal with this.
> 3. I set it to save HTML only, but it saves anything that I access
> with an address, so if I say "view image", and it shows the image's
> URL in the address bar, it saves the image, too. I just want to save
> the text-based information from the pages I visit. No images or
> movies or whatever.
I'm changing some things to make filtering more flexible, then this
would be possible.
> 4. It keeps giving me this interrupting modal window error "The link
> could not be saved. The web page might have been removed or had its
> name changed." I'd really like to turn that off, as it interrupts my
> work for no real reason, but I don't see an option. Turning it into
> an ignorable notification window or status bar icon would be much
> better.
Yeah, this comes from Firefox code - Slogger calls some of the same code
as when you select File->Save As... There are some bugs on
bugzilla.mozilla.org related to this - I'm not sure what the deal is.
> 5. Also, I would like to be able to filter more powerfully. For
> instance, filtering "google.com" currently makes it ignore google.com,
> but not www.google.com. Ideally, this or "*.google.com" would make it
> ignore all such incarnations without having to type them in, such as
> print.google.com, images.google.com, and so on. Maybe even better
> like filtering "*.google.com/search?q*", so I can filter out searches
> but still slog other parts of their site.
I'd like this too. Like I said above, I'm putting it in...
Ken
More information about the Slogger
mailing list